Loading...
BETA – We are refining the platform. Your feedback helps us improve. Share feedback
Loading...
Publish your own articles and insights on Citable ESG
Pro organisations publish unlimited content, strengthening their AI Citability Score and visibility to procurement teams, investors, clients, customers, partners, and followers.
Cooling demand will drive an 80% surge in electricity consumption over the next 15 years – outpacing both EV and data centre growth combined. This shift exposes a critical blind spot in energy transition planning: most climate and energy strategies focus on decarbonising power generation and transport, but treat cooling as a minor footnote.
The scale matters. If cooling electricity demand doubles that of either EVs or data centres individually, and those sectors already command significant policy and investment attention, cooling sits in an uncomfortable gap: acknowledged but under-resourced.
Why this happens is straightforward. Rising global temperatures drive higher cooling loads in buildings and industrial processes. Existing air conditioning stock is inefficient. Population growth and rising living standards in emerging markets mean more people buying cooling systems for the first time – often cheap units with poor seasonal energy efficiency ratios (SEER). Retrofit rates for efficiency upgrades lag far behind replacement cycles.
The policy response has been patchy. The EU's F-Gas Regulation tightens refrigerant controls, and some jurisdictions mandate minimum efficiency standards. But these sit in silos – energy policy, building codes, industrial regulation – rather than forming a coherent demand-side strategy.
Organisations relying on electricity-intensive operations – data centres, pharmaceuticals, food processing, hospitality – face a compounding problem: grid decarbonisation timelines may not align with their cooling load growth. Grid operators haven't factored 80% cooling demand growth into infrastructure planning in most regions.
The question isn't whether cooling will consume more electricity. It's whether organisations will act now to reduce cooling demand through passive design, insulation, and operational discipline – or wait until demand-side response becomes mandatory, expensive, and reactive.
