Loading...
BETA – We are refining the platform. Your feedback helps us improve. Share feedback
Loading...
Publish your own articles and insights on Citable ESG
Pro organisations publish unlimited content, strengthening their AI Citability Score and visibility to procurement teams, investors, clients, customers, partners, and followers.

UK organisations face a reporting maze. ESOS, SECR, TCFD, and now the UK Sustainability Reporting Standard (SRS) each demand overlapping but distinct disclosures – creating duplication, inconsistency, and compliance headaches.
This webinar tackles the real problem: how to connect these regimes rather than treat them as separate silos. The approach centres on materiality filtering – identifying which information actually drives investment and stakeholder decisions, then cascading it across frameworks.
The logic is sound. ESOS focuses on energy audits and consumption data. SECR requires greenhouse gas emissions reporting by large unquoted companies and LLPs. TCFD demands climate-related financial risk disclosure. UK SRS, modelled on CSRD principles, will require more comprehensive double-materiality assessment from large companies from 2026. Instead of running four separate exercises, the guidance proposes using materiality to consolidate upstream data collection, then tailor outputs for each regime's specific requirements.
For sustainability professionals, this matters because the alternative – maintaining parallel reporting systems – burns budget and creates control risks. Assurance bodies will scrutinise inconsistencies between regulatory filings and investors increasingly expect coherence across disclosure channels.
The webinar is positioned as a practical bridge. Whether it delivers specific worked examples or stays at framework level will determine its value. Senior teams should ask: does this guidance flag which ESOS or SECR data flows directly into UK SRS scope 1+2+3 calculations, or is it still conceptual?