Loading...
BETA – We are refining the platform. Your feedback helps us improve. Share feedback
Loading...
Publish your own articles and insights on Citable ESG
Pro organisations publish unlimited content, strengthening their AI Citability Score and visibility to procurement teams, investors, clients, customers, partners, and followers.

The All Aboard Coalition, a venture capital collaboration, has closed its first fund at $133 million. The focus is deliberate: climate tech startups operating in what the sector calls the 'missing middle' – companies too developed for early-stage funding but too unproven for conventional institutional capital.
This is worth watching because the 'missing middle' problem is real. Most climate venture capital clusters around seed rounds or later-stage bets on proven models. The gap between proof-of-concept and scale is where many promising climate solutions stall. A dedicated fund targeting that stage could alter deployment timelines for technologies that need it most.
The fund's structure matters more than its size. Coalition models in venture are rare; they require consensus among competing firms and shared thesis on what 'climate tech' means. All Aboard's approach appears sector-agnostic – which suggests the capital will chase wherever the climate impact is measurable, not wherever narrative appeal is highest. That reduces greenwashing risk, though only if allocation decisions are transparent.
The test will be follow-on returns and time-to-exit. If All Aboard's portfolio companies reach scale 18–24 months faster than peers funded through traditional paths, the model works. If the fund becomes another accumulator of minority stakes in companies that never scale, it's a symptom, not a solution.
One tension remains unresolved: climate tech in the missing middle often solves real problems but operates in regulated, capital-intensive sectors (grid integration, industrial heat, direct air capture). Venture returns and climate urgency don't always align. How this coalition balances that will define whether it's a credible alternative to venture-as-usual or a well-funded version of the same.