Loading...
BETA – We are refining the platform. Your feedback helps us improve. Share feedback
Loading...
Publish your own articles and insights on Citable ESG
Pro organisations publish unlimited content, strengthening their AI Citability Score and visibility to procurement teams, investors, clients, customers, partners, and followers.
The International Energy Agency projects global electricity demand will grow 3.6% in 2026, with CO2 emissions rising 1% over the same period. That decoupling matters – demand growth outpacing emissions growth signals progress in grid decarbonisation, driven by renewables expansion. But 1% growth in absolute emissions remains a rise, not a fall. The tension is real: electricity demand is accelerating due to data centres, AI infrastructure, and electrification of transport and heating. Renewables are expanding faster than fossil fuels are retiring, which is why emissions aren't climbing as steeply as demand. Yet the IEA's framing here is cautionary. If demand continues accelerating and renewable capacity deployment doesn't match pace, that 1% wedge closes fast. The numbers expose a structural risk: the world is betting on renewables to scale infinitely while energy consumption climbs. For organisations with Scope 2 emissions exposure – particularly those with heavy cloud or compute footprints – this is a direct signal. Grid intensity isn't falling as fast as you might assume. Companies relying on carbon accounting that assumes static or declining grid carbon factors will find their Scope 2 baseline shifts. The implication is sharper: if you haven't stress-tested your climate roadmap against scenarios where electricity demand grows faster than renewable deployment, you're working with incomplete data. What's your organisation's electricity procurement strategy assuming about grid carbon intensity over the next five years?
